- PCI Project -

> Project Definition
> Forms Download
> Events & Announcement
> Data Adjudication Comm.
> Definition Clarifications
> Operator Information

 

PCI Definition Clarifications

June 2005 ACC-NCDR Questions
The following questions were sent to ACC-NCDR for clarification of 3.04 version variables

Question: We have a patient who received lytics at another hospital, was transferred 2 days later to our hospital and then went for a cath /PCI the following day. Per FAQ ID#191 we are to code meds administered at a transferring facility, but what if the lytic therapy was not therapeutic at the time of admission to our facility, such as in this case? What if administration is 5 days prior to admit? Would an MI then be coded as previous MI? If similar to FAQ ID#550 on coumadin administration, it appears that it should be coded yes even if the med is not therapeutic.
ACC Reply: If it has been 5 or more days, I think it should be a no. If < 5 days, code yes. It is important to know if they got it. But 5 days ago would be a long time.

Question: We have a supply of Liberte Stents (Boston Scientific) but only the Taxus Liberte is listed in the device lists. Is there going to be an update to include bare metal Liberte stents?
ACC Reply: Yes, I added it to our inventory and will have it uploaded to the web.

Question: If a patient has had a cardiac transplant should we document any cardiac history relating to the patient's biological heart (such as a prior MI)?
ACC Reply: No, code based on the transplanted heart.

Question: I was involved in a case yesterday where we were planning on delivering a Cypher into a D1 but the stent fell off the balloon in the LMCA and we had to deploy it in the LMCA. I am not sure how to treat this. I have not created a new lesion in the LMCA because there was no lesion. Any suggestions?
ACC Reply: That has happened before. Create a new segment and code that a stent was utilized. It won't affect the calculation of success, but the fact that a stent has been deployed will be accounted for.

Question: We had a patient come in via life flight with a STEMI, but it was decided later that the EKG had been misinterpreted. He had clean coronaries and enzymes were negative. How do we code the admission symptoms?
ACC Reply: Code as atypical chest pain.

Question: For data element #658, we are using MRI's increasingly for assessment of LV function including EF, how should we be reporting this in terms of method by which it is obtained?
ACC Reply: Code estimate. I don't see another category that would fit correctly.

Question: A patient came in with an evolving MI. He had a diagnostic and intervention. While recovering, he had tamponade and shock due to free wall rupture as a complication of his infarct. All of the procedures were technically successful and the tamponade was related to the heart attack. The patient died. Do I mark the tamponade and shock as complications of the first procedure or not?
ACC Reply: Yes, they need to be coded even though the pt died. They need to be coded regardless of cause or timing (unless the patient is in the hospital >30 days and it occurs after that).